Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Brandon Eisert wins 0 (none); Jose Cuas wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Brandon Eisert
90.1
Jose Cuas
92.0
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Brandon Eisert
14.3%
Jose Cuas
13.1%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Brandon Eisert
28.0%
Jose Cuas
22.4%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Brandon Eisert
31.1%
Jose Cuas
32.7%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Brandon Eisert
37.7%
Jose Cuas
34.5%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Brandon Eisert
6.6%
Jose Cuas
1.8%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Brandon Eisert
.282
Jose Cuas
.357
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Brandon Eisert
2.786.92
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.86
3.70
Jose Cuas
2.786.92
lg xERA 4.10
now 6.00
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Brandon Eisert
1.171.44
now 1.37
1.24
Jose Cuas
1.171.44
now 1.33
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Brandon Eisert
4016.60
now 11
4
Jose Cuas
4016.60
now 3
4
Winshigher is better
Brandon Eisert
.0001.48
now 1
0–1
Jose Cuas
.0001.48
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowBrandon Eisert — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Hold · wait & seeJose Cuas — hold.conf 0.50