Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Cade Gibson wins 0 (none); Garrett Cleavinger wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Gibson
92.0
Garrett Cleavinger
96.6
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
9.1%
Garrett Cleavinger
13.5%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
18.8%
Garrett Cleavinger
29.8%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
31.9%
Garrett Cleavinger
33.8%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
38.0%
Garrett Cleavinger
40.8%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
3.1%
Garrett Cleavinger
7.8%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Gibson
.303
Garrett Cleavinger
.317
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Gibson
2.208.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 7.27
3.70
Garrett Cleavinger
2.208.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.65
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Cade Gibson
12.09
now 1.85
1.24
Garrett Cleavinger
12.09
now 1.46
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Gibson
4022.60
now 10
6
Garrett Cleavinger
4022.60
now 17
6
Winshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.0001.48
now 0
0–0
Garrett Cleavinger
.0001.48
now 1
0–1
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowCade Gibson — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Buy LowGarrett Cleavinger — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.77