Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Cade Gibson wins 1 (ERA); Jack Perkins wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Gibson
92.0
Jack Perkins
95.7
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
9.8%
Jack Perkins
12.7%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
19.6%
Jack Perkins
25.2%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
31.7%
Jack Perkins
33.7%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
36.2%
Jack Perkins
36.9%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
3.4%
Jack Perkins
8.5%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Gibson
.290
Jack Perkins
.309
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Gibson
2.028.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 7.27
3.52
Jack Perkins
2.028.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.46
3.91
WHIPlower is better
Cade Gibson
.9502.11
now 1.85
1.39
Jack Perkins
.9502.11
now 1.21
1.33
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Gibson
4046.20
now 10
0
Jack Perkins
4046.20
now 33
0
Winshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.0002.80
now 0
0–0
Jack Perkins
.0002.80
now 2
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowCade Gibson — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Buy LowJack Perkins — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90