Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 3 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV
▶
Cade Gibson wins 1 (K); Jordan Hicks wins 1 (SV); 3 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Gibson
92.1
Jordan Hicks
99.1
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
9.4%
Jordan Hicks
9.2%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
22.2%
Jordan Hicks
24.1%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
36.3%
Jordan Hicks
23.9%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
34.8%
Jordan Hicks
31.8%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
3.0%
Jordan Hicks
1.5%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Gibson
.285
Jordan Hicks
.291
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Gibson
2.278.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 7.27
3.70
Jordan Hicks
2.278.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.60
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Cade Gibson
.9002.43
now 1.85
1.24
Jordan Hicks
.9002.43
now 2.09
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Gibson
4029.60
now 10
24
Jordan Hicks
4029.60
now 15
17
Winshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Jordan Hicks
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Saveshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.0003.40
now 0
0
Jordan Hicks
.0003.40
now 1
0–2
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowCade Gibson — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Buy LowJordan Hicks — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.76