Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Cade Gibson wins 0 (none); Seth Halvorsen wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Gibson
92.5
Seth Halvorsen
98.9
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
8.0%
Seth Halvorsen
10.9%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
21.1%
Seth Halvorsen
19.3%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
32.5%
Seth Halvorsen
26.0%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
34.8%
Seth Halvorsen
40.4%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
2.2%
Seth Halvorsen
7.0%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Gibson
.313
Seth Halvorsen
.399
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Gibson
28.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 7.27
3.70
Seth Halvorsen
28.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.92
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Cade Gibson
12.09
now 1.85
1.24
Seth Halvorsen
12.09
now 1.54
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Gibson
4036.60
now 10
29
Seth Halvorsen
4036.60
now 13
29
Winshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Seth Halvorsen
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Gibson — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeSeth Halvorsen — hold.conf 0.50