Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Cade Gibson wins 0 (none); Trevor Richards wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Gibson
92.5
Trevor Richards
92.2
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
7.9%
Trevor Richards
9.7%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
20.0%
Trevor Richards
19.4%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
32.7%
Trevor Richards
27.6%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
34.8%
Trevor Richards
38.2%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
2.2%
Trevor Richards
7.9%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Gibson
.318
Trevor Richards
.321
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Gibson
2.278.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 7.27
3.70
Trevor Richards
2.278.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.63
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Cade Gibson
.9302.11
now 1.85
1.24
Trevor Richards
.9302.11
now 1.19
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Gibson
4042.20
now 10
33
Trevor Richards
4042.20
now 14
33
Winshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Trevor Richards
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Gibson — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeTrevor Richards — hold.conf 0.50