Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Jeffrey Springs wins 1 (ERA); Michael McGreevy wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
91.3
Michael McGreevy
91.9
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
10.6%
Michael McGreevy
9.0%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
17.8%
Michael McGreevy
16.4%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
30.0%
Michael McGreevy
28.5%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
34.9%
Michael McGreevy
41.8%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
9.4%
Michael McGreevy
9.1%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
.339
Michael McGreevy
.351
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
2.205.70
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.07
4.65
Michael McGreevy
2.205.70
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.98
4.92
WHIPlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
.9901.49
now 1.19
1.38
Michael McGreevy
.9901.49
now 1.10
1.33
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
4079.80
now 57
0
Michael McGreevy
4079.80
now 44
0
Winshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
.0004.20
now 3
0–0
Michael McGreevy
.0004.20
now 3
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellJeffrey Springs — sell.conf 0.81
SellMichael McGreevy — sell.conf 0.90