Who's more valuable, rest of season
Tanner Banks.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts.
Head-to-head
K
▶
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Tanner Banks wins 1 categories (K); Cade Gibson wins 0 (none); 3 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Gibson
92.0
Tanner Banks
92.0
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
8.8%
Tanner Banks
11.9%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
19.8%
Tanner Banks
22.6%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Gibson
36.0%
Tanner Banks
32.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
37.9%
Tanner Banks
33.3%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Gibson
3.4%
Tanner Banks
4.3%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Gibson
.310
Tanner Banks
.316
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Gibson
2.278.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 7.27
3.70
Tanner Banks
2.278.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 6.75
3.71
WHIPlower is better
Cade Gibson
.9102.39
now 1.85
1.24
Tanner Banks
.9102.39
now 2.06
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Gibson
4038
now 10
29
Tanner Banks
4038
now 25
30
Winshigher is better
Cade Gibson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Tanner Banks
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowCade Gibson — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Buy LowTanner Banks — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90