Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 3 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV
▶
Grant Wolfram wins 1 (K); Hunter Gaddis wins 1 (SV); 3 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
95.4
Hunter Gaddis
95.1
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
11.8%
Hunter Gaddis
15.2%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
24.5%
Hunter Gaddis
20.7%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
30.3%
Hunter Gaddis
30.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Grant Wolfram
36.5%
Hunter Gaddis
30.4%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Grant Wolfram
5.2%
Hunter Gaddis
8.8%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Grant Wolfram
.286
Hunter Gaddis
.335
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Grant Wolfram
3.424.68
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.02
3.70
Hunter Gaddis
3.424.68
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.40
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Grant Wolfram
1.101.74
now 1.53
1.24
Hunter Gaddis
1.101.74
now 1.60
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Grant Wolfram
4026.60
now 21
19
Hunter Gaddis
4026.60
now 12
12
Winshigher is better
Grant Wolfram
.0001.48
now 1
0–1
Hunter Gaddis
.0001.48
now 1
1–1
Saveshigher is better
Grant Wolfram
.0003.40
now 0
0
Hunter Gaddis
.0003.40
now 1
0–2
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowGrant Wolfram — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Hold · wait & seeHunter Gaddis — hold.conf 0.50