Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2, 1 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
WHIP
◀
W
SV
▶
Jacob Webb wins 2 (K, W); Nate Pearson wins 2 (ERA, SV); 1 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jacob Webb
94.1
Nate Pearson
97.7
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jacob Webb
16.9%
Nate Pearson
11.8%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jacob Webb
28.5%
Nate Pearson
19.4%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jacob Webb
34.0%
Nate Pearson
29.8%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jacob Webb
47.5%
Nate Pearson
33.3%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jacob Webb
9.1%
Nate Pearson
8.3%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jacob Webb
.321
Nate Pearson
.332
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jacob Webb
25.22
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.55
3.73
Nate Pearson
25.22
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.00
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Jacob Webb
.9901.44
now 1.34
1.24
Nate Pearson
.9901.44
now 1.09
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jacob Webb
4042.60
now 31
31
Nate Pearson
4042.60
now 2
12
Winshigher is better
Jacob Webb
.0002.80
now 1
1–2
Nate Pearson
.0002.80
now 0
0–0
Saveshigher is better
Jacob Webb
.00014
now 1
0–2
Nate Pearson
.00014
now 1
2–10
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeJacob Webb — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeNate Pearson — hold.conf 0.50