Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
◀
WHIP
W
▶
SV n/a
Jeffrey Springs wins 2 (K, WHIP); Slade Cecconi wins 2 (ERA, W); SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
91.4
Slade Cecconi
93.2
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
11.0%
Slade Cecconi
9.4%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
19.1%
Slade Cecconi
17.9%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
30.5%
Slade Cecconi
27.2%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
35.8%
Slade Cecconi
37.7%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
9.9%
Slade Cecconi
7.9%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
.335
Slade Cecconi
.329
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
3.605.72
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.07
4.54
Slade Cecconi
3.605.72
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.25
4.42
WHIPlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
1.071.61
now 1.19
1.35
Slade Cecconi
1.071.61
now 1.49
1.38
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
4062.60
now 57
51
Slade Cecconi
4062.60
now 50
44
Winshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
1.204.80
now 3
2–3
Slade Cecconi
1.204.80
now 3
2–4
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellJeffrey Springs — sell.conf 0.75
SellSlade Cecconi — sell.conf 0.70