Who's more valuable, rest of season
Jeffrey Springs.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts and WHIP.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
◀
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Jeffrey Springs wins 2 categories (K, WHIP); Trevor Rogers wins 1 (ERA); 1 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
91.4
Trevor Rogers
93.4
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
11.1%
Trevor Rogers
12.0%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
19.7%
Trevor Rogers
18.1%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
31.2%
Trevor Rogers
33.7%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
35.3%
Trevor Rogers
38.6%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
9.9%
Trevor Rogers
6.8%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
.331
Trevor Rogers
.313
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
2.967.95
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.07
4.42
Trevor Rogers
2.967.95
lg xERA 4.10
now 6.84
4.07
WHIPlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
1.041.71
now 1.19
1.33
Trevor Rogers
1.041.71
now 1.56
1.34
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
4077.20
now 57
66
Trevor Rogers
4077.20
now 38
56
Winshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
.8006.20
now 3
2–5
Trevor Rogers
.8006.20
now 2
2–4
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellJeffrey Springs — sell.conf 0.70
Hold · steadyTrevor Rogers — hold.conf 0.60