Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
WHIP
▶
◀
W
SV n/a
Jeffrey Springs wins 2 (K, W); Trevor Rogers wins 2 (ERA, WHIP); SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
91.4
Trevor Rogers
93.8
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
10.7%
Trevor Rogers
12.6%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
18.2%
Trevor Rogers
21.9%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
30.4%
Trevor Rogers
34.7%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
34.9%
Trevor Rogers
37.0%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
9.2%
Trevor Rogers
6.7%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
.336
Trevor Rogers
.294
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
2.308.14
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.07
4.57
Trevor Rogers
2.308.14
lg xERA 4.10
now 6.84
3.60
WHIPlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
1.041.71
now 1.19
1.37
Trevor Rogers
1.041.71
now 1.56
1.27
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
4076.20
now 57
12
Trevor Rogers
4076.20
now 38
9
Winshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
.0004.20
now 3
0–1
Trevor Rogers
.0004.20
now 2
0–1
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellJeffrey Springs — sell.conf 0.77
BuyTrevor Rogers — buy.conf 0.75