Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
▶
◀
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Mitch Farris wins 1 (WHIP); Nate Pearson wins 1 (ERA); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Mitch Farris
91.7
Nate Pearson
97.6
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Mitch Farris
12.7%
Nate Pearson
10.3%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Mitch Farris
24.4%
Nate Pearson
20.5%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Mitch Farris
29.0%
Nate Pearson
27.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Mitch Farris
46.5%
Nate Pearson
35.4%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Mitch Farris
9.1%
Nate Pearson
7.1%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Mitch Farris
.339
Nate Pearson
.321
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Mitch Farris
26.31
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.04
4.51
Nate Pearson
26.31
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.00
4.14
WHIPlower is better
Mitch Farris
.9201.69
now 1.52
1.38
Nate Pearson
.9201.69
now 1.09
1.46
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Mitch Farris
4030.80
now 22
0
Nate Pearson
4030.80
now 2
0
Winshigher is better
Mitch Farris
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Nate Pearson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellMitch Farris — sell.conf 0.81
Hold · leans sellNate Pearson — hold.conf 0.60