Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Paxton Schultz wins 0 (none); Tanner Banks wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Paxton Schultz
93.6
Tanner Banks
92.0
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Paxton Schultz
8.4%
Tanner Banks
11.2%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Paxton Schultz
20.9%
Tanner Banks
21.6%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Paxton Schultz
27.2%
Tanner Banks
31.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Paxton Schultz
39.3%
Tanner Banks
33.6%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Paxton Schultz
8.4%
Tanner Banks
6.6%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Paxton Schultz
.342
Tanner Banks
.315
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Paxton Schultz
2.497.97
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.91
3.72
Tanner Banks
2.497.97
lg xERA 4.10
now 6.75
3.71
WHIPlower is better
Paxton Schultz
.9102.39
now 1.36
1.24
Tanner Banks
.9102.39
now 2.06
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Paxton Schultz
4035
now 24
0
Tanner Banks
4035
now 25
0
Winshigher is better
Paxton Schultz
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Tanner Banks
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seePaxton Schultz — hold.conf 0.55
Buy LowTanner Banks — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90