Who's more valuable, rest of season
Grant Wolfram.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts and wins. Nate Pearson’s box score looks better right now, but it’s built on luck that won’t hold.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
WHIP
◀
W
SV
▶
Grant Wolfram wins 2 categories (K, W); Nate Pearson wins 1 (SV); 2 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
95.4
Nate Pearson
97.6
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
11.8%
Nate Pearson
9.8%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
24.5%
Nate Pearson
17.6%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Grant Wolfram
30.3%
Nate Pearson
28.8%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Grant Wolfram
36.5%
Nate Pearson
35.3%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Grant Wolfram
5.2%
Nate Pearson
5.9%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Grant Wolfram
.286
Nate Pearson
.328
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Grant Wolfram
25.63
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.02
3.70
Nate Pearson
25.63
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.00
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Grant Wolfram
.9101.71
now 1.53
1.24
Nate Pearson
.9101.71
now 1.09
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Grant Wolfram
4028.60
now 21
18
Nate Pearson
4028.60
now 2
8
Winshigher is better
Grant Wolfram
.0001.48
now 1
0–1
Nate Pearson
.0001.48
now 0
0–0
Saveshigher is better
Grant Wolfram
.0008.40
now 0
0
Nate Pearson
.0008.40
now 1
1–6
If you already own them — trade angle
Buy LowGrant Wolfram — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90
Sell HighNate Pearson — sell high. His value is peaking; good time to trade him.conf 0.95