Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Hunter Brown wins 1 (ERA); Nathan Eovaldi wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Hunter Brown
96.2
Nathan Eovaldi
94.4
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Hunter Brown
11.3%
Nathan Eovaldi
15.2%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Hunter Brown
27.5%
Nathan Eovaldi
23.5%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Hunter Brown
27.5%
Nathan Eovaldi
36.4%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Hunter Brown
36.9%
Nathan Eovaldi
41.6%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Hunter Brown
6.0%
Nathan Eovaldi
8.3%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Hunter Brown
.282
Nathan Eovaldi
.318
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Hunter Brown
25.59
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.84
3.32
Nathan Eovaldi
25.59
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.93
4.23
WHIPlower is better
Hunter Brown
.9001.49
now 1.03
1.36
Nathan Eovaldi
.9001.49
now 1.11
1.22
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Hunter Brown
4093.80
now 17
0
Nathan Eovaldi
4093.80
now 67
0
Winshigher is better
Hunter Brown
.0007
now 1
0–0
Nathan Eovaldi
.0007
now 5
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
BuyHunter Brown — buy.conf 0.83
Hold · leans sellNathan Eovaldi — hold.conf 0.60