Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Jacob Latz wins 1 (ERA); Tanner Scott wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jacob Latz
94.8
Tanner Scott
96.9
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jacob Latz
16.6%
Tanner Scott
20.0%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jacob Latz
30.6%
Tanner Scott
32.7%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jacob Latz
35.8%
Tanner Scott
40.7%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jacob Latz
41.2%
Tanner Scott
34.6%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jacob Latz
8.5%
Tanner Scott
6.5%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jacob Latz
.253
Tanner Scott
.270
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jacob Latz
23.44
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.00
2.66
Tanner Scott
23.44
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.19
3.03
WHIPlower is better
Jacob Latz
.9001.35
now 0.59
1.13
Tanner Scott
.9001.35
now 0.69
1.08
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jacob Latz
4039.20
now 26
0
Tanner Scott
4039.20
now 28
0
Winshigher is better
Jacob Latz
.0001.48
now 1
0–0
Tanner Scott
.0001.48
now 1
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Sell HighJacob Latz — sell high. His value is peaking; good time to trade him.conf 0.86
BuyTanner Scott — buy.conf 0.92