Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Jonathan Bowlan wins 1 (ERA); Tanner Scott wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jonathan Bowlan
97.1
Tanner Scott
96.9
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jonathan Bowlan
15.7%
Tanner Scott
19.9%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jonathan Bowlan
31.9%
Tanner Scott
32.4%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jonathan Bowlan
35.2%
Tanner Scott
40.9%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jonathan Bowlan
36.5%
Tanner Scott
34.4%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jonathan Bowlan
7.3%
Tanner Scott
6.6%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jonathan Bowlan
.262
Tanner Scott
.271
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jonathan Bowlan
25.66
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.67
2.85
Tanner Scott
25.66
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.19
3.06
WHIPlower is better
Jonathan Bowlan
.9001.33
now 1.15
1.10
Tanner Scott
.9001.33
now 0.69
1.09
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jonathan Bowlan
4039.20
now 16
0
Tanner Scott
4039.20
now 28
0
Winshigher is better
Jonathan Bowlan
.0001.48
now 1
0–0
Tanner Scott
.0001.48
now 1
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
BuyJonathan Bowlan — buy.conf 0.92
BuyTanner Scott — buy.conf 0.91