Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 3 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV
▶
Alan Rangel wins 1 (K); Nate Pearson wins 1 (SV); 3 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Alan Rangel
92.9
Nate Pearson
97.7
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Alan Rangel
11.6%
Nate Pearson
10.7%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Alan Rangel
25.9%
Nate Pearson
19.0%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Alan Rangel
32.8%
Nate Pearson
29.7%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Alan Rangel
34.0%
Nate Pearson
30.9%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Alan Rangel
5.7%
Nate Pearson
7.3%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Alan Rangel
.291
Nate Pearson
.325
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Alan Rangel
25.18
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.25
3.70
Nate Pearson
25.18
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.00
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Alan Rangel
.9001.34
now 1.00
1.24
Nate Pearson
.9001.34
now 1.09
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Alan Rangel
4063.60
now 9
46
Nate Pearson
4063.60
now 2
11
Winshigher is better
Alan Rangel
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Nate Pearson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Saveshigher is better
Alan Rangel
.00012.60
now 0
0
Nate Pearson
.00012.60
now 1
2–9
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeAlan Rangel — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeNate Pearson — hold.conf 0.50