Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2, 1 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
◀
W
SV
▶
Brent Headrick wins 2 (ERA, W); Tanner Scott wins 2 (WHIP, SV); 1 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Brent Headrick
94.2
Tanner Scott
96.8
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Brent Headrick
17.6%
Tanner Scott
19.8%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Brent Headrick
30.7%
Tanner Scott
31.6%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Brent Headrick
34.9%
Tanner Scott
41.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Brent Headrick
37.0%
Tanner Scott
34.5%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Brent Headrick
4.3%
Tanner Scott
7.0%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Brent Headrick
.262
Tanner Scott
.275
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Brent Headrick
23.58
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.00
2.83
Tanner Scott
23.58
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.19
3.13
WHIPlower is better
Brent Headrick
.9001.64
now 1.37
1.18
Tanner Scott
.9001.64
now 0.69
1.08
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Brent Headrick
4038.60
now 29
5
Tanner Scott
4038.60
now 28
5
Winshigher is better
Brent Headrick
.0004.20
now 3
0–1
Tanner Scott
.0004.20
now 1
0–0
Saveshigher is better
Brent Headrick
.0007
now 0
0
Tanner Scott
.0007
now 5
1–1
If you already own them — trade angle
BuyBrent Headrick — buy.conf 0.92
BuyTanner Scott — buy.conf 0.89