Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2, 1 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
WHIP
▶
◀
W
SV
Jeff Hoffman wins 2 (K, W); Tanner Scott wins 2 (ERA, WHIP); 1 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jeff Hoffman
96.4
Tanner Scott
96.8
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jeff Hoffman
18.7%
Tanner Scott
19.8%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jeff Hoffman
34.3%
Tanner Scott
31.6%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jeff Hoffman
37.4%
Tanner Scott
41.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jeff Hoffman
37.2%
Tanner Scott
34.5%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jeff Hoffman
9.0%
Tanner Scott
7.0%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jeff Hoffman
.288
Tanner Scott
.275
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jeff Hoffman
27.96
lg xERA 4.10
now 6.31
3.44
Tanner Scott
27.96
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.19
3.13
WHIPlower is better
Jeff Hoffman
.9002.17
now 1.75
1.23
Tanner Scott
.9002.17
now 0.69
1.08
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jeff Hoffman
4061
now 45
7
Tanner Scott
4061
now 28
5
Winshigher is better
Jeff Hoffman
.0005.60
now 4
0–1
Tanner Scott
.0005.60
now 1
0–0
Saveshigher is better
Jeff Hoffman
.0006.60
now 5
1–1
Tanner Scott
.0006.60
now 5
1–1
If you already own them — trade angle
BuyJeff Hoffman — buy.conf 0.80
BuyTanner Scott — buy.conf 0.89