Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Carmen Mlodzinski wins 1 (ERA); Jeffrey Springs wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
95.0
Jeffrey Springs
91.3
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
9.4%
Jeffrey Springs
10.6%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
18.1%
Jeffrey Springs
17.8%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
28.7%
Jeffrey Springs
30.0%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
46.5%
Jeffrey Springs
34.9%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
6.9%
Jeffrey Springs
9.4%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Carmen Mlodzinski
.337
Jeffrey Springs
.339
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Carmen Mlodzinski
3.405.01
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.76
4.61
Jeffrey Springs
3.405.01
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.07
4.65
WHIPlower is better
Carmen Mlodzinski
1.101.51
now 1.42
1.39
Jeffrey Springs
1.101.51
now 1.19
1.38
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Carmen Mlodzinski
4079.80
now 46
0
Jeffrey Springs
4079.80
now 57
0
Winshigher is better
Carmen Mlodzinski
.0005.60
now 4
0–0
Jeffrey Springs
.0005.60
now 3
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellCarmen Mlodzinski — sell.conf 0.79
SellJeffrey Springs — sell.conf 0.81