Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Craig Kimbrel wins 0 (none); Nate Pearson wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Craig Kimbrel
93.6
Nate Pearson
97.6
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Craig Kimbrel
11.1%
Nate Pearson
10.1%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Craig Kimbrel
20.4%
Nate Pearson
20.8%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Craig Kimbrel
28.7%
Nate Pearson
27.6%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Craig Kimbrel
36.6%
Nate Pearson
36.0%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Craig Kimbrel
5.3%
Nate Pearson
7.2%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Craig Kimbrel
.316
Nate Pearson
.321
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Craig Kimbrel
27.88
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.63
3.70
Nate Pearson
27.88
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.00
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Craig Kimbrel
.9501.58
now 1.44
1.24
Nate Pearson
.9501.58
now 1.09
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Craig Kimbrel
4023.80
now 17
0
Nate Pearson
4023.80
now 2
0
Winshigher is better
Craig Kimbrel
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Nate Pearson
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCraig Kimbrel — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeNate Pearson — hold.conf 0.50