Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
◀
WHIP
W
▶
SV n/a
Hunter Greene wins 2 (K, WHIP); Kyle Bradish wins 2 (ERA, W); SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Hunter Greene
98.4
Kyle Bradish
94.0
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Hunter Greene
14.5%
Kyle Bradish
11.2%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Hunter Greene
30.9%
Kyle Bradish
23.1%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Hunter Greene
31.6%
Kyle Bradish
30.5%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Hunter Greene
46.6%
Kyle Bradish
37.3%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Hunter Greene
5.2%
Kyle Bradish
8.0%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Hunter Greene
.332
Kyle Bradish
.304
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Hunter Greene
28.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 21.60
4.10
Kyle Bradish
28.25
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.44
3.85
WHIPlower is better
Hunter Greene
.9002.55
now 3.30
1.30
Kyle Bradish
.9002.55
now 1.42
1.38
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Hunter Greene
4088.20
now 7
65
Kyle Bradish
4088.20
now 65
50
Winshigher is better
Hunter Greene
.0004.20
now 0
0–0
Kyle Bradish
.0004.20
now 3
1–3
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeHunter Greene — hold.conf 0.55
Hold · leans buyKyle Bradish — hold.conf 0.60
