Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
◀
WHIP
W
▶
SV n/a
Jeffrey Springs wins 1 (WHIP); Mike Burrows wins 1 (W); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
91.4
Mike Burrows
95.0
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
11.0%
Mike Burrows
10.7%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
19.1%
Mike Burrows
17.7%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Jeffrey Springs
30.5%
Mike Burrows
32.3%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
35.8%
Mike Burrows
38.8%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
9.9%
Mike Burrows
8.4%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Jeffrey Springs
.335
Mike Burrows
.336
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
3.545.93
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.07
4.54
Mike Burrows
3.545.93
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.40
4.56
WHIPlower is better
Jeffrey Springs
1.091.55
now 1.19
1.35
Mike Burrows
1.091.55
now 1.45
1.41
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
43.4062.60
now 57
49
Mike Burrows
43.4062.60
now 54
49
Winshigher is better
Jeffrey Springs
1.204.80
now 3
2–3
Mike Burrows
1.204.80
now 3
2–4
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellJeffrey Springs — sell.conf 0.75
Hold · leans sellMike Burrows — hold.conf 0.60