Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 0–0, 4 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
ERA
WHIP
W
SV n/a
Burch Smith wins 0 (none); Scott Blewett wins 0 (none); 4 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Burch Smith
93.8
Scott Blewett
95.4
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Burch Smith
10.4%
Scott Blewett
14.4%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Burch Smith
27.4%
Scott Blewett
22.7%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Burch Smith
26.2%
Scott Blewett
38.1%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Burch Smith
47.8%
Scott Blewett
33.8%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Burch Smith
4.3%
Scott Blewett
2.6%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Burch Smith
.287
Scott Blewett
.275
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Burch Smith
25.18
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.18
3.70
Scott Blewett
25.18
lg xERA 4.10
now 0.00
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Burch Smith
1.141.60
now 1.47
1.24
Scott Blewett
1.141.60
now 1.50
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Burch Smith
4027.20
now 20
5
Scott Blewett
4027.20
now 2
5
Winshigher is better
Burch Smith
.000.480
now 0
0–0
Scott Blewett
.000.480
now 0
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeBurch Smith — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeScott Blewett — hold.conf 0.50