Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 2–2. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
◀
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
▶
SV n/a
Slade Cecconi wins 2 (K, ERA); Steven Matz wins 2 (WHIP, W); SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Slade Cecconi
93.2
Steven Matz
93.3
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Slade Cecconi
9.3%
Steven Matz
10.3%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Slade Cecconi
18.0%
Steven Matz
17.8%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Slade Cecconi
27.6%
Steven Matz
27.5%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Slade Cecconi
39.0%
Steven Matz
36.1%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Slade Cecconi
8.3%
Steven Matz
13.0%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Slade Cecconi
.333
Steven Matz
.366
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Slade Cecconi
4.205.55
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.25
4.50
Steven Matz
4.205.55
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.67
5.24
WHIPlower is better
Slade Cecconi
1.141.59
now 1.49
1.39
Steven Matz
1.141.59
now 1.24
1.37
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Slade Cecconi
4056
now 50
42
Steven Matz
4056
now 35
41
Winshigher is better
Slade Cecconi
.4007.60
now 3
2–3
Steven Matz
.4007.60
now 4
3–6
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
SellSlade Cecconi — sell.conf 0.73
SellSteven Matz — sell.conf 0.90