Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Chase Burns wins 1 (ERA); Emmet Sheehan wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Chase Burns
97.6
Emmet Sheehan
94.4
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Chase Burns
15.7%
Emmet Sheehan
16.0%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Chase Burns
29.4%
Emmet Sheehan
28.0%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Chase Burns
34.3%
Emmet Sheehan
35.5%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Chase Burns
38.2%
Emmet Sheehan
38.5%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Chase Burns
8.0%
Emmet Sheehan
9.7%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Chase Burns
.279
Emmet Sheehan
.292
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Chase Burns
25.52
lg xERA 4.10
now 1.96
3.25
Emmet Sheehan
25.52
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.50
3.57
WHIPlower is better
Chase Burns
.9001.35
now 0.96
1.24
Emmet Sheehan
.9001.35
now 1.16
1.18
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Chase Burns
40100.80
now 72
0
Emmet Sheehan
40100.80
now 62
0
Winshigher is better
Chase Burns
.0009.80
now 7
0–0
Emmet Sheehan
.0009.80
now 3
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
BuyChase Burns — buy.conf 0.85
BuyEmmet Sheehan — buy.conf 0.76