Who's more valuable, rest of season
Too close to call.
They split your categories 1–1, 2 even. Take whoever fills a bigger need.
Head-to-head
K
◀
ERA
WHIP
▶
W
SV n/a
Chase Burns wins 1 (ERA); Jake Bennett wins 1 (WHIP); 2 even; SV n/a.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Chase Burns
97.6
Jake Bennett
92.8
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Chase Burns
15.7%
Jake Bennett
12.7%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Chase Burns
29.4%
Jake Bennett
20.0%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Chase Burns
34.3%
Jake Bennett
37.4%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Chase Burns
38.2%
Jake Bennett
37.9%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Chase Burns
8.0%
Jake Bennett
7.9%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Chase Burns
.279
Jake Bennett
.286
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Chase Burns
26.61
lg xERA 4.10
now 1.96
3.24
Jake Bennett
26.61
lg xERA 4.10
now 5.28
3.42
WHIPlower is better
Chase Burns
.9001.72
now 0.96
1.24
Jake Bennett
.9001.72
now 1.50
1.21
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Chase Burns
40100.80
now 72
0
Jake Bennett
40100.80
now 8
0
Winshigher is better
Chase Burns
.0009.80
now 7
0–0
Jake Bennett
.0009.80
now 1
0–0
SV — not applicable. Both pitch out of the rotation.
If you already own them — trade angle
BuyChase Burns — buy.conf 0.86
BuyJake Bennett — buy.conf 0.80