Who's more valuable, rest of season
Cade Smith.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts, WHIP, wins, and saves.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
◀
WHIP
◀
W
◀
SV
Cade Smith wins 4 categories (K, WHIP, W, SV); Grant Anderson wins 0 (none); 1 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Smith
96.9
Grant Anderson
93.3
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
17.0%
Grant Anderson
11.8%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
34.8%
Grant Anderson
19.3%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Smith
33.5%
Grant Anderson
28.1%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
45.2%
Grant Anderson
38.5%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
10.4%
Grant Anderson
6.8%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Smith
.286
Grant Anderson
.281
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Smith
2.154.12
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.60
3.68
Grant Anderson
2.154.12
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.59
3.68
WHIPlower is better
Cade Smith
.9001.35
now 1.08
1.23
Grant Anderson
.9001.35
now 0.99
1.25
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Smith
4052
now 42
34
Grant Anderson
4052
now 18
17
Winshigher is better
Cade Smith
.0002.80
now 2
1–2
Grant Anderson
.0002.80
now 1
0–1
Saveshigher is better
Cade Smith
.00029.40
now 20
11–21
Grant Anderson
.00029.40
now 0
0
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Smith — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeGrant Anderson — hold.conf 0.50