Who's more valuable, rest of season
Cade Smith.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, wins, and saves.
Head-to-head
◀
K
◀
ERA
◀
WHIP
◀
W
◀
SV
Cade Smith wins 5 categories (K, ERA, WHIP, W, SV); Grant Wolfram wins 0 (none).
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Smith
96.9
Grant Wolfram
95.3
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
17.0%
Grant Wolfram
12.3%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
34.8%
Grant Wolfram
25.0%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Smith
33.5%
Grant Wolfram
30.8%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
45.2%
Grant Wolfram
38.1%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
10.4%
Grant Wolfram
6.0%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Smith
.286
Grant Wolfram
.292
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Smith
2.034.59
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.60
3.68
Grant Wolfram
2.034.59
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.02
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Cade Smith
.9001.71
now 1.08
1.23
Grant Wolfram
.9001.71
now 1.53
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Smith
4050.40
now 42
34
Grant Wolfram
4050.40
now 21
25
Winshigher is better
Cade Smith
.5202.48
now 2
1–2
Grant Wolfram
.5202.48
now 1
1–2
Saveshigher is better
Cade Smith
.00029.40
now 20
11–21
Grant Wolfram
.00029.40
now 0
0
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Smith — hold.conf 0.50
Buy LowGrant Wolfram — buy low. The dip is a window to acquire.conf 0.90