Who's more valuable, rest of season
Cade Smith.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, wins, and saves.
Head-to-head
◀
K
◀
ERA
◀
WHIP
◀
W
◀
SV
Cade Smith wins 5 categories (K, ERA, WHIP, W, SV); Hunter Gaddis wins 0 (none).
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Smith
96.9
Hunter Gaddis
95.1
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
17.0%
Hunter Gaddis
15.2%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
34.8%
Hunter Gaddis
21.5%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Smith
33.5%
Hunter Gaddis
32.6%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
45.2%
Hunter Gaddis
27.4%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
10.4%
Hunter Gaddis
7.3%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Smith
.286
Hunter Gaddis
.312
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Smith
25.12
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.60
3.68
Hunter Gaddis
25.12
lg xERA 4.10
now 4.40
3.70
WHIPlower is better
Cade Smith
.9001.81
now 1.08
1.23
Hunter Gaddis
.9001.81
now 1.60
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Smith
4054
now 42
34
Hunter Gaddis
4054
now 12
15
Winshigher is better
Cade Smith
.5202.48
now 2
1–2
Hunter Gaddis
.5202.48
now 1
1–2
Saveshigher is better
Cade Smith
.00029
now 20
11–21
Hunter Gaddis
.00029
now 1
1–2
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Smith — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeHunter Gaddis — hold.conf 0.50