Who's more valuable, rest of season
Cade Smith.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts, wins, and saves.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
▶
WHIP
◀
W
◀
SV
Cade Smith wins 3 categories (K, W, SV); Tanner Scott wins 1 (ERA); 1 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Smith
96.9
Tanner Scott
96.8
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
17.0%
Tanner Scott
19.8%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
34.8%
Tanner Scott
34.7%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Smith
33.5%
Tanner Scott
40.5%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
45.2%
Tanner Scott
30.0%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
10.4%
Tanner Scott
6.7%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Smith
.286
Tanner Scott
.255
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Smith
24.28
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.60
3.68
Tanner Scott
24.28
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.19
3.66
WHIPlower is better
Cade Smith
.9001.45
now 1.08
1.23
Tanner Scott
.9001.45
now 0.69
1.23
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Smith
4050
now 42
34
Tanner Scott
4050
now 28
22
Winshigher is better
Cade Smith
.5202.48
now 2
1–2
Tanner Scott
.5202.48
now 1
1–1
Saveshigher is better
Cade Smith
.00028.20
now 20
11–21
Tanner Scott
.00028.20
now 5
3–6
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Smith — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seeTanner Scott — hold.conf 0.50