Who's more valuable, rest of season
Cade Smith.
He projects to help you in more roto categories the rest of the way — strikeouts, WHIP, wins, and saves.
Head-to-head
◀
K
ERA
◀
WHIP
◀
W
◀
SV
Cade Smith wins 4 categories (K, WHIP, W, SV); Paul Sewald wins 0 (none); 1 even.
04
Under the hood
Underlying skill — each value vs league avgFastball Velolg 94.0 · higher = better
Cade Smith
96.9
Paul Sewald
91.4
Swinging-Strike %lg 11.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
17.0%
Paul Sewald
14.6%
Strikeout %lg 22.0% · higher = better
Cade Smith
34.8%
Paul Sewald
27.7%
Chase %lg 28.5% · higher = better
Cade Smith
33.5%
Paul Sewald
30.6%
Hard-Hit % Allowedlg 40.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
45.2%
Paul Sewald
41.6%
Barrel % Allowedlg 8.0% · lower = better
Cade Smith
10.4%
Paul Sewald
12.4%
xwOBA Allowedlg .315 · lower = better
Cade Smith
.286
Paul Sewald
.283
stabilized — trust it · small sample yet · dashed = league avg · right = better
05
The tape
Rest-of-season projection · bold = leads rest-of-season projection current season projection range
Rate · earned-run quality
ERAlower is better
Cade Smith
2.164.13
lg xERA 4.10
now 2.60
3.68
Paul Sewald
2.164.13
lg xERA 4.10
now 3.63
3.69
WHIPlower is better
Cade Smith
.9001.45
now 1.08
1.23
Paul Sewald
.9001.45
now 0.72
1.24
Volume · rest of season
Strikeoutshigher is better
Cade Smith
4050
now 42
34
Paul Sewald
4050
now 24
22
Winshigher is better
Cade Smith
.5202.48
now 2
1–2
Paul Sewald
.5202.48
now 1
1–1
Saveshigher is better
Cade Smith
4.2025.80
now 20
11–21
Paul Sewald
4.2025.80
now 15
9–18
If you already own them — trade angle
Hold · wait & seeCade Smith — hold.conf 0.50
Hold · wait & seePaul Sewald — hold.conf 0.50